🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just who would win overall, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots added later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where election day turned out somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani added half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously backed the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does so afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. The independent held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many Republicans on the island with a high participation. I believe occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. But no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.